Humanity has been in constant war since time immemorial. Could we consider why we replace the term "dictator" with "president" and "parliament"? After all, when we go to vote, no one tells us that there will be a war. We bear responsibility for the misinformation we've received. Conflicts don't start that way. Someone is always ready. Alternatively, there may be a vested interest in creating conflicts. With a bare ass, what can someone do? Nothing. So someone paid him and, most importantly, provided him with weapons. In the past two years, almost all countries have increased their arms budgets. What follows is that reducing other features improves the citizen's condition. All other things—education, health care, infrastructure, subsidizing food, and others—have no way to improve. Not to mention research centers that need more money to discover better medicines and everything needed for better living. It affects almost every family. In a word, the common man has no fault. It's primarily businesses connected to politicians that are responsible for these actions. I am quite certain that very few people desire to go to war. I don't know what the solution is. But one is upbringing from childhood. Another potential solution could be organizing games similar to the Olympics in a specific location, where individuals with harmful intentions might congregate and engage in violence against one another. But from year to year, instead of improving the state of the countries, it will get worse. It is not clear; for example, if a small country with a small budget buys a hundred tanks, WHAT IS THE EFFECT? Five planes or something. Wouldn't it be better to create a single global military organization? All countries should participate in this organization. If a problem emerges, the specific country should suppress it. However, this is an idealistic view.
In a world that often measures success by bank statements and material possessions, it is easy to forget what it really means to be “rich.” If we rethink the concept, we will see that wealth is not what we accumulate for ourselves but what we contribute to the world. As I have a saying, “If we think morally right and our actions are in the interest of people and nature, then we show how rich we are.” This statement of mine challenges the logic of consumer society. Wealth here is transformed from quantity of possessions to quality of character. In the moral choices of everyday life, Wealth is manifested in our ability to make the “right” choices when no one is looking. Would you choose to support a local producer, even if the product is somewhat pricier, instead of buying a mass-produced product that supports exploitative practices? This act is an investment in society—you are “rich” in consciousness. When we care for nature as a legacy, which is our greatest asset, we often treat it as...

If you want to read one of my books, "Manners in the Great Kingdom," "The Wealth of the Great Kingdom," "The Heir of the Dynasty," or "369 Hours of Punishment," "Unforgettable personalities of History"
ReplyDeleteYou can search for an e-book/paperback/hardcover in many stores. Amazon, eBay, Adlibris, Powells, Rakuten, Kobo, Barnes, Kinokuniya, Thalia, JPC, Abebooks.com, Takealot.com, BookLooker, Alibris, Morawa, Booktopia, Thriftbooks, WOM, Google Play, Flipkart, Hugendubel, Bücher, Michaelsbund, Dumocks, Kitapavrupa, Pandora, BOL, Orellfüssli, Lehmanns, Walmart, Eurobuch, Tredition, Biblio, Faltershop, Helikon, Legimi, Bokus, D§R, Imge, Cinius, Indigo, Imusic, Athenaeum, Kaufland, Mondadoristore, Paagman, Weltbild, Betterworldbooks, Blackwells, Ebook, Exlibris, Lesen, Libroworld, Lesejury, Kitapsepeti, Ozone and many others