My personal opinion

 We live in an era of hyper-connectivity, yet emotional distance between nations has never been wider. Every day, the news is filled with geopolitical conflicts, economic crises, and political scandals. But as the decisions of world leaders spark global outrage, a dangerous psychological phenomenon takes roots: collective hate. When a government makes a destructive choice, the world quickly turns its anger toward the entire population of that country. We blame the citizens, the culture, and the individual human beings who happen to hold that specific passport. But is this anger justified? Or have we fallen into one of humanity’s oldest and most dangerous intellectual traps? The most common argument for collective blame is democratic choice: "But they voted for them!" However, this logic crumbles under the reality of modern politics. Political campaigns are built on promises that are frequently broken the moment elections end. Citizens often choose the "lesser of two evil...

 We live in a time when information is generated faster than we can digest it. A single tweet, unverified video, or provocative headline can travel the globe in seconds, influencing millions of minds before anyone bothers to ask a simple question: “Where’s the evidence?” The digital space has subtly replaced evidence with narrative. But should we believe everything we read on the internet? The short answer is no. The internet thrives on emotion, not accuracy. Algorithms are programmed to amplify content that evokes shock, anger, or moral outrage because outrage generates clicks. When emotion drives the news feed, facts become secondary. A well-crafted lie wrapped in passion will almost always trump a quiet, nuanced truth. Think about how quickly online crowds gather to condemn a person, company, or political figure. Imagine a viral post that reads, “Person X is corrupt and has ruined the lives of hundreds!” Within hours: The headline gets thousands of shares. The comment sections f...

My e-books are FREE on Smashwords this month. 🥳 Dive in or gift it to a friend. Don't miss out on this limited-time offer! 📚 👇 https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/Sezgin_Ismailov /   👇 You can find it in stores as a hardcover, softcover, or e-book. The titles include Manners in the Great Kingdom, The Wealth of the Great Kingdom, The Heir of the Dynasty,  369 Hours of Punishment, and Unforgettable Personalities of History. Amazon, eBay, Adlibris, Powells, Rakuten, Kobo, Barnes & Noble, Kinokuniya, Thalia, JPC, Abebooks.com, Takealot.com, Booklooker, Alibris, Morawa, Booktopia, Thriftbooks, WOM, Google Play, Flipkart, Hugendubel, Bücher, Michaelsbund, Dumocks, Kitapavrupa, Pandora, BOL, Orellfüssli, Lehmanns, Walmart, Eurobuch, Tredition, Biblio, Faltershop, Helikon, Legimi, Bokus, D§R, Imge, Cinius, Indigo, Imusic, Athenaeum, Kaufland, Mondadoristore, Paagman, Weltbild, Betterworldbooks, Blackwells, Ebook, Exlibris, Lesen, Libroworld, Lesejury, Kitapsepeti, and...

In a world that often measures success by bank statements and material possessions, it is easy to forget what it really means to be “rich.” If we rethink the concept, we will see that wealth is not what we accumulate for ourselves but what we contribute to the world. As I have a saying, “If we think morally right and our actions are in the interest of people and nature, then we show how rich we are.” This statement of mine challenges the logic of consumer society. Wealth here is transformed from quantity of possessions to quality of character. In the moral choices of everyday life, Wealth is manifested in our ability to make the “right” choices when no one is looking. Would you choose to support a local producer, even if the product is somewhat pricier, instead of buying a mass-produced product that supports exploitative practices? This act is an investment in society—you are “rich” in consciousness. When we care for nature as a legacy, which is our greatest asset, we often treat it as...

We’ve all heard the adage, “Lend a hand.” It’s etched into our collective consciousness as the epitome of human kindness, a fundamental pillar of community and compassion. See someone struggling? Reach out! Offer support! Be the hero they need! It sounds wonderful, right? Like something straight out of a feel-good movie. But here’s a rather uncomfortable truth, one that flies in the face of all those warm fuzzy feelings: people sometimes prefer not to receive open help. And believe it or not, in today’s hyper-individualistic, often privacy-obsessed world, this sentiment is becoming even more pronounced. It’s a strange paradox: we yearn for connection but often recoil from direct intervention when we’re at our most vulnerable. Think about it. There’s a quiet dignity in solving your problems, isn’t there? You experience a feeling of victory when you successfully navigate a challenging situation without requiring assistance. When someone swoops in with an outstretched hand, no matter ...

Let's be real for a second. Whether you're glancing at your retirement fund, scrolling through job postings, or just trying to navigate the price of groceries, there's one thing that feels constant: change. People often perceive this constant change as instability. The stock market experiences fluctuations, the job market adapts to technological advancements, and even the housing market exhibits unpredictable fluctuations. It's enough to make anyone feel twitchy about their future. That's why I love this quote from Mikhail Barshchevsky: "Markets are unstable. Invest in yourself." Simple, right? However, the implications are profound.  This piece of wisdom isn't just a clever saying. Firstly, Barshchevsky confronts us with the harsh reality: "Markets are unstable." And he's not wrong. Financial Markets: Stocks go up and down. Cryptocurrencies soar and plummet. Interest rates fluctuate, affecting everything from your savings to your mortgag...