Have you ever struggled to explain a challenging experience to someone who has never experienced anything remotely similar? Perhaps you were extremely concerned about finances, and a friend with a trust fund simply suggested, "Why don't you just save more?" Or perhaps you were battling a chronic illness, and someone perpetually healthy suggested you "just try thinking positively." In those moments, you probably felt a pang of frustration, thinking, "They just don't get it." "A full man does not believe a hungry man." It's a simple sentence, but its wisdom runs deep, touching on empathy, perspective, and the sometimes-invisible walls that separate our understanding of the world. First, let’s clarify that this proverb is not solely about someone who has eaten a large lunch and doubts the existence of someone who is literally starving. This quote isn't just about someone with a full belly. It represents someone who enjoys a state of comfort, security, and privilege in various aspects of life. They might be financially stable, healthy, mentally sound, well-educated, or have a strong support system. They've rarely, if ever, had to truly struggle for their fundamental needs or face significant systemic barriers. Their "fullness" means they don't experience scarcity, fear, or profound lack. Conversely, the "hungry man" is someone experiencing genuine deprivation or hardship. Such destitution could be literal hunger but also includes financial insecurity, chronic illness, mental health struggles, lack of opportunities, discrimination, or living in an unstable environment. Their "hunger" signifies a deep-seated need, a constant struggle, or an awareness of limited resources that shapes their daily reality. The core of the proverb is that it's incredibly difficult for someone living in a state of comfort to truly grasp, or even believe, the stark realities and desperate needs of someone experiencing deprivation. Their comfortable reality makes the other's struggle seem alien, exaggerated, or even self-inflicted. This disconnect isn't necessarily because the "full man" is mean-spirited or intentionally dismissive. Often, it's a fundamental lack of shared experience. Our brains are wired to understand the world through our lens. If you've never had to worry about where your next meal comes from, it's difficult to internalize the paralyzing fear of food insecurity. If you've always had access to excellent healthcare, the concept of being unable to afford life-saving medication might seem like a distant, unbelievable horror. This lack of firsthand experience can lead to several things: Skepticism: "Is it really that bad?" Minimization: "They're just exaggerating." Blame: "They must have done something wrong to put themselves into that situation." Oversimplification: "Why don't they just obtain a better job/move/try harder?" It's easier for the comfortable mind to invent a simple explanation or dismiss the problem than to confront a reality that might be deeply uncomfortable or challenge their worldview. Imagine a multi-millionaire CEO who dismisses calls for a living wage, suggesting that minimum wage workers should rely on their own initiative. He may genuinely believe that anyone can achieve wealth if they work diligently enough, because that was his experience, perhaps forgetting inherited advantages or lucky breaks. Meanwhile, the worker struggling to pay rent and feed their family on poverty wages knows that "hard work" alone isn't always enough to overcome systemic barriers. The "full" owner simply cannot fathom the "hungry" worker's daily impossible choices. Someone who has always been robustly healthy might struggle to believe the severity of chronic pain, invisible illnesses like fibromyalgia or lupus, or the debilitating effects of long-term depression. They might offer well-intentioned but ultimately unhelpful advice like "just exercise more" or "you need a better attitude," because their own "fullness" of health prevents them from understanding the "hunger" for basic physical or mental well-being. Individuals who have never experienced racial discrimination, gender bias, or ableism might genuinely doubt the experiences of those who face these challenges daily. "Racism doesn't exist anymore," says the person who has never been judged by their skin color. "Women are treated equally," claims someone who has never faced workplace sexism. A student from a well-funded school district with ample resources, tutors, and extracurriculars might struggle to understand why a student from an underfunded, struggling school in a different neighborhood performs differently. They might attribute it to individual effort rather than the vast disparity in opportunities among their resources, blinding them to the need for basic educational support elsewhere. Understanding "A full man does not believe a hungry man" isn't just an intriguing observation; it's crucial for building a more empathetic and just society. When individuals in positions of power, influence, or comfort fail to acknowledge the realities faced by those who are struggling, it results in "full" people frequently devising solutions for "hungry" people; however, these solutions often fall short because they do not address the root causes or true impacts of deprivation. If struggles aren't believed, they aren't addressed, allowing cycles of poverty, illness, and discrimination to continue. It creates a chasm of misunderstanding and resentment between different groups in society. If we dismiss someone's struggle, a good first step might be to ask ourselves if our "fullness" is preventing us from truly hearing their "hunger." It challenges us to actively listen, to seek different perspectives, and to cultivate the empathy needed to bridge those understanding gaps, even when our experiences don't directly align. We can only start addressing their needs if we genuinely believe in the "hungry man." This just popped up in my mind because when I see some people looking for money to conquer other planets. Others talk about how advanced artificial intelligence is and how everything will be great. Politicians discuss rearmament and cutting spending needed to improve lives. Others kill innocent people every day. Some call for the wars to stop; others call for us to provide them some food. And the reality is that half the world still does not have access to clean water. How many people really go to bed hungry is unknown, and others throw away food they bought and didn't use. Diverse individuals hold varying perspectives.
.jpg)
